Skip to content
RFJ
Article & fatwas
Article & fatwaMedium trust

Large-scale capital can be raised without interest-bearing bonds

Large-scale capital can be raised without interest-bearing bonds — sukuk are certificates of undivided ownership in real assets, where holders earn a share of the income those assets generate rather than a contractual interest payment, so a government or company can fund itself through ownership and rent instead of debt and usury; AAOIFI codified them in Shari'ah Standard No.17 (2003), the international market opened with the Central Bank of Bahrain's first US-dollar ijara sukuk in 2001, and the sector continues to grow (Wikipedia; IFSB Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report 2025)

What this source says

If charity can be lent without interest (qard hasan), risk pooled without it (takaful), and public goods endowed without it (waqf), one large objection still stands: surely a modern state or corporation cannot raise capital at scale without issuing interest-bearing bonds? Sukuk are the standing answer that it can. The instrument exists precisely because, as the Wikipedia entry puts it, 'Sukuk were developed as an alternative to conventional bonds, which are not permissible in Islam as they pay interest (prohibited or discouraged as Riba, or usury).' The difference is not cosmetic; it is structural, and it turns on what the certificate actually represents. A conventional bond is a loan: 'a bond is a contractual debt obligation of the issuer to pay to bondholders'. A sukuk is a title to property: it is 'a certificate giving its holders an undivided beneficial ownership in the underlying assets.' Put as plainly as the source does, 'Sukuk should indicate partial ownership of an asset. Bonds indicate a debt obligation.' This is the definition the industry's standard-setter has codified. The Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) 'issued "Shari'ah Standard No.17" on "Investment Sukuk" in May 2003', defining them as 'certificates of equal value representing undivided shares in the ownership of tangible assets, usufructs and services or (in the ownership of) the assets of particular projects or special investment activity' — in Wikipedia's gloss, 'securities of equal denomination representing individual ownership interests in a portfolio of eligible existing or future assets.' Because the holder owns a slice of real assets rather than a promise to repay money plus interest, the return is generated by the assets, not charged on a loan: 'sukuk holders are entitled to share in the revenues generated by the sukuk assets as well as being entitled to share in the proceeds of the realization of the sukuk assets.' In the most common structure, a lease (ijara), the economics are recognisable but the contract is transformed: 'The fixed interest of a conventional bond is replaced by fixed lease income' — the investor owns the asset and is paid rent for its use, rather than lending cash and charging interest for its time. This is not a paper experiment. 'In 2001, the sukuk market went international with the issuance of the first US-dollar-denominated ijara sukuk, worth $100 million, by the Central Bank of Bahrain' — a central bank, raising hard-currency capital through asset ownership and rent rather than a coupon. The market has grown into a recognised global asset class since: the Islamic Financial Services Board reports that in 2024 'sukuk issuances increased by 25.6%'. Honest limits belong here too. The corpus already documents one specific use of this instrument — the UK's sovereign sukuk — and this entry is the general mechanism behind it, not a second country case. Scholars and regulators draw a real and contested line between 'asset-backed' sukuk, where holders genuinely own and bear the risk of the underlying assets, and 'asset-based' sukuk, where the structure leans on the originator's promise to repurchase at face value and so behaves much like a conventional bond in substance — a critique AAOIFI itself has pressed, and the reason a sukuk's Shari'ah-compliance depends on its actual structure and not merely its label. The precise current global size of the market is reported inconsistently across commercial data houses, so this entry asserts no single live figure, anchoring instead to a dated, verbatim outstanding figure ('As of early 2017, there were US$328 billion worth of sukuk outstanding worldwide') and the IFSB's dated, primary 2024 growth rate. What the case establishes is the narrow, durable point the sceptic said was impossible: that a sovereign or a corporation can raise capital at scale through certified, undivided ownership of real assets and a share of the income they produce — without interest, and with the lending-at-interest at the heart of a conventional bond structurally replaced by ownership and rent — and that this has operated as a real, growing capital market for over two decades.

Wording inside quotation marks is quoted from the source. The rest is this notebook’s summary of it — read the original before relying on it.

Provenance

Compiled from
Compiled from neutral third-party sources: Wikipedia 'Sukuk' (quoting AAOIFI Shari'ah Standard No.17); Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB), Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report 2025
Source
DEFINITION + BOND CONTRAST + OWNERSHIP-NOT-DEBT + RETURN-FROM-ASSETS + IJARA LEASE-INCOME + RIBA RATIONALE + AAOIFI STANDARD No.17 + FIRST INTERNATIONAL (BAHRAIN 2001) + 2017 OUTSTANDING (neutral encyclopaedia quoting AAOIFI, verbatim): Wikipedia, 'Sukuk' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukuk) — verbatim: 'Sukuk were developed as an alternative to conventional bonds, which are not permissible in Islam as they pay interest (prohibited or discouraged as Riba, or usury)'; 'a bond is a contractual debt obligation of the issuer to pay to bondholders'; 'a sukuk is a certificate giving its holders an undivided beneficial ownership in the underlying assets'; 'Sukuk should indicate partial ownership of an asset. Bonds indicate a debt obligation'; AAOIFI 'issued "Shari'ah Standard No.17" on "Investment Sukuk" in May 2003'; '(certificates of equal value representing undivided shares in the ownership of tangible assets, usufructs and services or (in the ownership of) the assets of particular projects or special investment activity)'; 'securities of equal denomination representing individual ownership interests in a portfolio of eligible existing or future assets'; 'sukuk holders are entitled to share in the revenues generated by the sukuk assets as well as being entitled to share in the proceeds of the realization of the sukuk assets'; 'The fixed interest of a conventional bond is replaced by fixed lease income'; 'In 2001, the sukuk market went international with the issuance of the first US-dollar-denominated ijara sukuk, worth $100 million, by the Central Bank of Bahrain'; 'As of early 2017, there were US$328 billion worth of sukuk outstanding worldwide'. SCALE / GROWTH (primary regulator, verbatim): Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB), Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report 2025 (covering 2024) press release (https://www.ifsb.org/press-releases/islamic-financial-services-industry-stability-report-2025-need-for-coordinated-action-to-deepen-markets-and-sustain-growth-momentum/) — verbatim: 'sukuk issuances increased by 25.6%' (2024).
School / basis
Comparative (sukuk as the asset-backed/asset-based capital-markets instrument codified by AAOIFI Shari'ah Standard No.17 (2003) and recognised across the contemporary Islamic-finance institutions as the riba-free alternative to the interest-bearing conventional bond)
Captured
2026-06-30
Added
2026-06-30
Trust
Useful and cited, but with an editorial or commercial lean worth cross-checking.

Compiler’s note

First DEDICATED SUKUK mechanism entry in the corpus — the capital-markets instrument that answers the last big structural sceptic challenge after qard hasan (round-70 Akhuwat), takaful (round-71) and waqf (round-72): 'can a state or corporation raise capital AT SCALE without issuing interest-bearing bonds?'. Grep-confirmed before writing: 'sukuk' appeared in the corpus only as (a) a single COUNTRY case, content/articles/uk-sovereign-sukuk.json (the UK's sovereign issuance), and (b) passing mentions inside national-banking articles — never as a dedicated entry on the instrument itself. This entry is the GENERAL MECHANISM behind that UK case, NOT a duplicate (different topic: the asset-backed-certificate instrument vs one sovereign's use of it). VERIFICATION (each load-bearing fact verified BY ME on 2026-06-30 via two WebFetch reads of the actual pages, not on a researcher's word): (1) the definition, the bond/sukuk contrast, the ownership-not-debt line, the return-from-asset-revenues line, the ijara 'fixed lease income' line, the riba rationale, the AAOIFI Shari'ah Standard No.17 (May 2003) definition, the Central Bank of Bahrain 2001 first-international-USD-ijara-sukuk fact, and the 'As of early 2017 ... US$328 billion ... outstanding' figure ALL confirmed VERBATIM on the Wikipedia 'Sukuk' article; (2) the scale-direction anchor 'sukuk issuances increased by 25.6%' (2024) confirmed VERBATIM on the IFSB Stability Report 2025 press release (the same primary-regulator source the takaful entry used). TRUST marked 'medium' (NOT 'high'): the mechanism facts are well-corroborated but rest on an encyclopaedia entry (which itself quotes AAOIFI) rather than my reading the primary AAOIFI Standard No.17 PDF directly; the growth figure is primary-verified but is a one-year issuance rate, not an audited outstanding-market size. DELIBERATELY DROPPED / NOT ASSERTED per the no-fabrication rule: (a) any single CURRENT global sukuk market-size dollar figure — commercial data houses report it inconsistently, so NO live size is asserted; load-bearing scale = only the dated verbatim 2017 outstanding figure + the dated primary IFSB 2024 growth rate; (b) the widely-repeated 'Malaysia issued the first global sovereign sukuk in 2002' claim — it was NOT present on the Wikipedia page I read at capture, so it is NOT asserted; the international-market origin is anchored instead to the verbatim-confirmed Bahrain 2001 USD ijara sukuk; (c) any Shari'ah ruling certifying every sukuk structure flawless — the text documents the instrument's stated mechanics, explicitly surfaces the genuine, AAOIFI-pressed 'asset-backed vs asset-based' debate (where some structures behave like conventional bonds in substance), and notes compliance depends on actual structure not label. FRESHNESS-HONEST: the outstanding figure is dated 'as of early 2017', the growth figure dated 2024, the first-international issuance dated 2001 and AAOIFI standard dated 2003; nothing volatile is presented as a current market size. JSON-only per the established article convention (content/articles/*.json feed app/lib/corpus.ts + the /corpus stats badge + Phase-2 retrieval; they are NOT rendered as individual cards), so no SourceCard/route added and internal-link integrity is unaffected. Articles bucket now also covers the sukuk / asset-backed-securities mechanism and the case of riba-free CAPITAL-MARKETS funding at sovereign and corporate scale.

Topics

islamic-financeribainterestsukukbondscapital-marketsasset-backedijaraaaoifibahraininstitutions

This is source material, not a ruling. The corpus records what a named source actually said, so that you can read it yourself and take it to a scholar you trust. Ask the corpus to search all entries at once, or return to the library.

Ask