Skip to content
RFJ
Edition · United States · Provider

SP Funds (SPUS / SPSK / SPRE)

Investing · Family of Shariah-compliant ETFs (equity, sukuk, REIT)

Back to the US audit
SP Funds (SPUS / SPSK / SPRE)
Investing (Family of Shariah-compliant ETFs (equity, sukuk, REIT))
Likely Permissible

StructureSPUS tracks the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index (~200 names, excluding e.g. Aerospace & Defense, Financial Exchanges & Data, Data Processing). SPSK tracks the Dow Jones Sukuk Total Return Index (Shariah fixed income). SPRE tracks an S&P Global Shariah REIT index. SP Funds publishes a Purification Calculator for dividend purification.

A family of US-listed Shariah ETFs managed per AAOIFI rules by ShariaPortfolio, with a published purification calculator. Structurally investment products that clear the lens more cleanly than home finance. Verify each fund's named Shariah committee, expense ratio, and how the industry-exclusion overlay shifts risk versus the parent index.

Read the contract →
High confidence

Contract-grade public documents were read directly (e.g. a full Terms & Conditions or a scholar-reviewed contract). This rates our certainty, not the provider’s compliance.

Last reviewed2 June 2026Next review due2 September 2026Corrections log

Established & regulatory standing

The verifiable facts

Established

SP Funds launched its first Shariah-compliant ETFs in December 2019; the sponsor/adviser group is ShariaPortfolio (founded 2003 by Naushad Virji). NYSE-listed.

Regulatory standing

US-listed '40 Act ETFs (SEC-regulated); ShariaPortfolio, Inc. is an SEC-registered investment adviser (CRD #173937). Market risk applies; no deposit insurance.

Shariah board

Who certifies it

Managed per AAOIFI rules; ShariaPortfolio cites AAOIFI as the governing standards body. The named Shariah advisory committee for each fund is best confirmed on its prospectus.

A named, credentialled board is a real signal — but a provider’s own board certifying its own product is not the same as arm’s-length review. Weigh it alongside the independent commentary below.

How the structure works

The mechanics, in principle

SPUS tracks the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index (~200 names, excluding e.g. Aerospace & Defense, Financial Exchanges & Data, Data Processing). SPSK tracks the Dow Jones Sukuk Total Return Index (Shariah fixed income). SPRE tracks an S&P Global Shariah REIT index. SP Funds publishes a Purification Calculator for dividend purification.

This describes the structure in principle — it is not a verdict on the executed contract. How the contract actually behaves is what the checklist below tests.

From the public documents

How the contract actually works

Read from SP Funds (SPUS / SPSK / SPRE)’s own public materials — white papers, product pages, FAQs and fatāwā — not its executed contract, which is generally not published. Where a point is undisclosed, it is said plainly rather than guessed. Sources are listed below.

Audit V2 (methodology-grounded, from S&P Dow Jones Indices' published Shariah methodology — the screen these funds actually track). Structurally these are screened equity/REIT/sukuk products, not debt instruments, so the lens that troubles home finance does not apply: a shareholder owns a slice of the underlying businesses. What is auditable here is the rigour of the screen, and S&P's is public and AAOIFI-derived in two layers. (1) Business-activity screen — companies are excluded for involvement in alcohol, tobacco, pork, gambling, conventional (interest-based) financial services, weapons/defence and adult entertainment; SPUS layers on further sub-industry exclusions (Aerospace & Defense, Financial Exchanges & Data, Data Processing). (2) Accounting screen — a company is dropped if total/interest-bearing debt exceeds 33% of its trailing-average market capitalisation, if cash plus interest-bearing securities exceeds 33%, or if accounts receivable exceeds 49% of that market cap; residual non-permissible (chiefly interest) income must stay under 5% of revenue, and the portion that slips through is what the published Purification Calculator quantifies for the investor to give away. Honest limits worth weighing: S&P's receivables threshold (49%) is more lenient than stricter AAOIFI readings (~30%), and its denominator is a market-cap average rather than total assets — a live point of scholarly disagreement on screen conservatism, not a defect we can assert; the named individual scholars on SP Funds' own Shariah committee are not surfaced (the funds state they are 'managed per AAOIFI rules' rather than naming a board); and the exact current thresholds, index names and rebalancing cadence should be confirmed against the live prospectus, as index methodologies are periodically revised.

The Six-Pillar test

The questions that decide it

This is the universal lens this site applies to every home-finance contract, anywhere. Read each pillar as a question to put to SP Funds (SPUS / SPSK / SPRE)’s executed contract — not its brochure.

  1. 1

    Real ownership

    Does the financier genuinely take ownership of the asset — even briefly — and bear a real owner's risk, rather than only ever holding a debt secured against it?

  2. 2

    Risk-sharing

    If the asset is destroyed or its value collapses, does the financier share that loss in proportion to its stake, or is the customer left bearing it alone?

  3. 3

    Rent vs interest

    In a lease/co-ownership, is the rent benchmarked to a genuine market rent for the property — or is it calibrated to an interest rate (a base-rate + margin) in disguise?

  4. 4

    Default mechanism

    On default, does the contract behave like the end of a real lease/partnership — or does it accelerate like a loan, demanding the full outstanding 'principal' plus charges?

  5. 5

    No guaranteed pre-fixed return

    Is the financier's return tied to real ownership and risk, or is it a pre-fixed, guaranteed sum that arrives regardless of what happens to the asset?

  6. 6

    Substance over form

    Strip away the Arabic labels: does the cashflow, risk, and outcome differ from a conventional loan — or is it the same economics wearing a compliant name (ḥiyal)?

Before you sign

What to ask SP Funds (SPUS / SPSK / SPRE), in writing

Put these to the provider in writing and keep the answers. The reply — not the marketing — is what tells you whether the structure holds.

  • Who sits on SP Funds' named Shariah supervisory board, and how often do they audit holdings?

  • How should I use the purification calculator, and what income is deemed impure?

  • What are each fund's expense ratio, liquidity, and tracking error?

  • How does the industry-exclusion overlay change SPUS's risk/sector profile vs the S&P 500?

The honest gap

What we have not verified

The exact limits of this read — where our confidence ends.

Sources

What this read is built on

The verifiable references behind this page — provider documents and independent scholarly resolutions. Read them yourself; do not take our summary on trust.

Ask